Foreman 1.1 RC1 release notes

Sam_Kottler1 · December 12, 2012, 6:12pm

Hi all,

I've posted the release notes for Foreman 1.1 RC1 on the wiki [1]. As subsequent RC's are released I will write additional release notes just for the differences since the last RC. Then, once the final release of 1.1 goes out I will write a complete set of notes with all the changes.

If you haven't had a chance to try out the RC's and would like to, be sure to check out Greg's email for Debian [2] and mine about RPM's [3].

-Sam

Roman_Shaposhnik1 · December 18, 2012, 1:55am

I'm seeing a pretty messed up UI under Chrome on Ubuntu. Firefox
on the same machine renders the UI fine. Anybody else has the
same issue?

Thanks,
Roman.

···

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Sam Kottler wrote: > If you haven't had a chance to try out the RC's and would like to, be sure to check out Greg's email for Debian [2] and mine about RPM's [3].

Thomas_Bendler1 · December 21, 2012, 4:20pm

Hi Sam,

> […]
> I've posted the release notes for Foreman 1.1 RC1 on the wiki [1]. As
> subsequent RC's are released I will write additional release notes just for
> the differences since the last RC. Then, once the final release of 1.1 goes
> out I will write a complete set of notes with all the changes.
> […]
>

since upgrading to RC1 I can't use authentication against our Active
Directory any more (local admin user IDs still work). No error message,
only user or password is incorrect. But my user ID and password isn't
wrong, the connection definition wasn't touched and I got a locked User ID
after a while. So look like that the connection itself is still running but
maybe some changes occur in the hash values or so. Any idea on that issue?

Regards, Thomas

···

2012/12/12 Sam Kottler -- Linux ... enjoy the ride!

Sam_Kottler1 · December 18, 2012, 5:17am

What's broken in the UI with Chrome? If there are specific issues with different elements feel free to file bugs [1]. I am using Chrome with Fedora and the RC looks fine.

-Sam

Foreman

···

----- Original Message ----- From: "Roman Shaposhnik" To: foreman-users@googlegroups.com Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 8:55:11 PM Subject: Re: [foreman-users] Foreman 1.1 RC1 release notes

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Sam Kottler skottler@redhat.com wrote:

If you haven’t had a chance to try out the RC’s and would like to, be sure to check out Greg’s email for Debian [2] and mine about RPM’s [3].

I’m seeing a pretty messed up UI under Chrome on Ubuntu. Firefox
on the same machine renders the UI fine. Anybody else has the
same issue?

Thanks,
Roman.

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Foreman users” group.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users?hl=en.

Roman_Shaposhnik1 · December 18, 2012, 6:35am

Done: Bug #2053: Google Chrome 18.0.1025.168 on Ubuntu Lucid messes up Foreman 1.1RC UI - Foreman

Let me know if you need help reproducing (or whether I should forget about
it and upgrade ;-)).

Thanks,
Roman.

···

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Sam Kottler wrote: > What's broken in the UI with Chrome? If there are specific issues with different > elements feel free to file bugs [1]. I am using Chrome with Fedora and the RC looks fine.

Sam_Kottler1 · December 18, 2012, 1:01pm

Thanks Roman!

-Sam

···

----- Original Message ----- From: "Roman Shaposhnik" To: foreman-users@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 1:35:31 AM Subject: Re: [foreman-users] Foreman 1.1 RC1 release notes

On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Sam Kottler skottler@redhat.com wrote:

What’s broken in the UI with Chrome? If there are specific issues with different
elements feel free to file bugs [1]. I am using Chrome with Fedora and the RC looks fine.

Done: Bug #2053: Google Chrome 18.0.1025.168 on Ubuntu Lucid messes up Foreman 1.1RC UI - Foreman

Let me know if you need help reproducing (or whether I should forget about
it and upgrade ;-)).

Thanks,
Roman.

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Foreman users” group.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users?hl=en.

Roman_Shaposhnik1 · December 18, 2012, 5:17pm

My pleasure! I keep kicking the tires on RC1.1 for the POC that
I'm running right now. Do you want me to keep appending things
I find to this thread or start separate ones?

My current problem is that a freshly installed Foreman with
Postgres backend and fully functioning tftp smart proxy
can't seem to be able to execute 'Build PXE defaul' action
failing with:

···

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Sam Kottler wrote: > Thanks Roman!

====================================================
failed to process template: exp not empty after
Safemode::Parser.process_call on s(s(:call, s(:lvar, :profile), :[],
s(:lit, :hostgroup)))

Thanks,
Roman.

Dominic_Cleal1 · December 19, 2012, 10:19am

This seems to be down to safemode and ruby_parser gem versions:
http://theforeman.org/issues/2029

If you've got safemode 1.1.0, then make sure you have ruby_parser 3.x
installed (probably 3.0.4). If you have 1.0.1, make sure you have
ruby_parser 2.x installed. Hopefully you can confirm this.

We're trying to move to safemode 1.1.0 for Ruby 1.9 support and this
will then require ruby_parser 3.0.x
(https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/283).

···

On 18/12/12 17:17, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Sam Kottler wrote: >> Thanks Roman! > > My pleasure! I keep kicking the tires on RC1.1 for the POC that > I'm running right now. Do you want me to keep appending things > I find to this thread or start separate ones? > > My current problem is that a freshly installed Foreman with > Postgres backend and fully functioning tftp smart proxy > can't seem to be able to execute 'Build PXE defaul' action > failing with: > ==================================================== > failed to process template: exp not empty after > Safemode::Parser.process_call on s(s(:call, s(:lvar, :profile), :[], > s(:lit, :hostgroup))) > ====================================================

–
Dominic Cleal
Red Hat Engineering

Roman_Shaposhnik1 · December 20, 2012, 6:17am

Thanks you so much! Switching to the safemode 1.1.0 (via
installing a gem locally) completely fixed the issue.

Am I correct in my understanding that you guys plan to
fix this for Foreman 1.1?

Thanks,
Roman.

···

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote: > We're trying to move to safemode 1.1.0 for Ruby 1.9 support and this > will then require ruby_parser 3.0.x > (https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/283).

Dominic_Cleal1 · December 20, 2012, 9:05am

>> We're trying to move to safemode 1.1.0 for Ruby 1.9 support and this
>> will then require ruby_parser 3.0.x
>> (https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/283).
>
> Thanks you so much! Switching to the safemode 1.1.0 (via
> installing a gem locally) completely fixed the issue.

Good to hear, thanks.

> Am I correct in my understanding that you guys plan to
> fix this for Foreman 1.1?

Yes, we're hoping to integrate the Ruby 1.9 support branch in for the
next RC, which will include updating safemode and others.

···

On 20/12/12 06:17, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote:

–
Dominic Cleal
Red Hat Engineering

Roman_Shaposhnik1 · December 20, 2012, 4:38pm

Perfect! What's an approximate time-line for the next RC and release in
general?

I've got this selfish desire to test the heck out of your 1.1 RCs so that
we can have a perfect Foreman for our environment when 1.1 does
get released

Thanks,
Roman.

···

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote: > Yes, we're hoping to integrate the Ruby 1.9 support branch in for the > next RC, which will include updating safemode and others.

Sam_Kottler1 · December 20, 2012, 4:58pm

RC2 should be out early next week. I'll send a post when the new packages are available, as well as release notes.

Thanks so much for testing!

-Sam

···

----- Original Message ----- From: "Roman Shaposhnik" To: foreman-users@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 11:38:12 AM Subject: Re: [foreman-users] Foreman 1.1 RC1 release notes

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Dominic Cleal dcleal@redhat.com wrote:

Yes, we’re hoping to integrate the Ruby 1.9 support branch in for the
next RC, which will include updating safemode and others.

Perfect! What’s an approximate time-line for the next RC and release in
general?

I’ve got this selfish desire to test the heck out of your 1.1 RCs so that
we can have a perfect Foreman for our environment when 1.1 does
get released

Thanks,
Roman.

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Foreman users” group.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users?hl=en.

Foreman 1.1 RC1 release notes

==================================================== failed to process template: exp not empty after Safemode::Parser.process_call on s(s(:call, s(:lvar, :profile), :[], s(:lit, :hostgroup)))

====================================================
failed to process template: exp not empty after
Safemode::Parser.process_call on s(s(:call, s(:lvar, :profile), :[],
s(:lit, :hostgroup)))