[Foreman 1.10 RC1] rhscl-ruby193-epel-7 not signed?

Support
1

Hi,

Late to the show with the latest Foreman release, but I'm getting the
following when running foreman-installer:

[root@katello ~]# foreman-installer
Execution of '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install foreman-release-scl'
returned 1: Package rhscl-ruby193-epel-7-x86_64-1-2.noarch.rpm is not signed
/Stage[main]/Foreman::Install::Repos::Extra/Package[foreman-release-scl]/ensure:
change from absent to present failed: Execution of '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0
-y install foreman-release-scl' returned 1: Package
rhscl-ruby193-epel-7-x86_64-1-2.noarch.rpm is not signed
Execution of '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install foreman-cli' returned 1:
Error: Package: tfm-rubygem-friendly_id-4.0.10.1-2.el7.noarch (foreman)

As with all my install tests, this is a fresh CentOS 7 install, yum
updated, repos installed and foreman-installer installed during the
kickstart. I then run foreman-installer in my first ssh onto the box. The
kickstart contains the following in the %post section:

yum -y update

yum -y install http://yum.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs-release-el-7.noarch.rpm
yum -y install epel-release
http://yum.theforeman.org/releases/1.10/el7/x86_64/foreman-release.rpm

yum -y install foreman-installer

Duncan

2

Yes, we're tracking this under
Bug #12230: rubygem-rdoc-3.12-12.el6.x86_64.rpm signed with revoked key - Packaging - Foreman and I'll have a look during
the RC2 publish. Hopefully I can sort it out then.

For now please just install the two rhscl* packages without GPG checking.

··· On 27/10/15 11:23, Duncan Innes wrote: > Hi, > > Late to the show with the latest Foreman release, but I'm getting the > following when running foreman-installer: > > [root@katello ~]# foreman-installer > Execution of '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install foreman-release-scl' > returned 1: Package rhscl-ruby193-epel-7-x86_64-1-2.noarch.rpm is not signed > /Stage[main]/Foreman::Install::Repos::Extra/Package[foreman-release-scl]/ensure: > change from absent to present failed: Execution of '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e > 0 -y install foreman-release-scl' returned 1: Package > rhscl-ruby193-epel-7-x86_64-1-2.noarch.rpm is not signed > Execution of '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install foreman-cli' returned > 1: Error: Package: tfm-rubygem-friendly_id-4.0.10.1-2.el7.noarch (foreman)

–
Dominic Cleal
dominic@cleal.org

3

>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Late to the show with the latest Foreman release, but I'm getting the
> > following when running foreman-installer:
> >
> > [root@katello ~]# foreman-installer
> > Execution of '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install foreman-release-scl'
> > returned 1: Package rhscl-ruby193-epel-7-x86_64-1-2.noarch.rpm is not
> signed
> >
> /Stage[main]/Foreman::Install::Repos::Extra/Package[foreman-release-scl]/ensure:
>
> > change from absent to present failed: Execution of '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e
> > 0 -y install foreman-release-scl' returned 1: Package
> > rhscl-ruby193-epel-7-x86_64-1-2.noarch.rpm is not signed
> > Execution of '/usr/bin/yum -d 0 -e 0 -y install foreman-cli' returned
> > 1: Error: Package: tfm-rubygem-friendly_id-4.0.10.1-2.el7.noarch
> (foreman)
>
> Yes, we're tracking this under
> Bug #12230: rubygem-rdoc-3.12-12.el6.x86_64.rpm signed with revoked key - Packaging - Foreman and I'll have a look during
> the RC2 publish. Hopefully I can sort it out then.
>
> For now please just install the two rhscl* packages without GPG checking.
>
>
No problem.

Cheers

D

··· On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 12:29:06 UTC, Dominic Cleal wrote: > On 27/10/15 11:23, Duncan Innes wrote:

–
Dominic Cleal
dom...@cleal.org <javascript:>