foreman-packaging-rpm-nightly-release 1117 failed

jenkins · October 18, 2021, 1:40pm

foreman-packaging-rpm-nightly-release failed for nodejs-theforeman-builder,nodejs-theforeman-vendor,rubygem-pulp_ansible_client,rubygem-pulp_certguard_client,rubygem-pulp_container_client,rubygem-pulp_deb_client,rubygem-pulp_file_client,rubygem-pulp_python_client,rubygem-pulp_rpm_client,rubygem-smart_proxy_host_reports

https://ci.theforeman.org/job/foreman-packaging-rpm-nightly-release/1117/

Foreman RPM packaging release job failed: foreman-packaging-rpm-nightly-release #1117 [Jenkins]

pcreech · October 18, 2021, 1:44pm

My bad, I added hte package to ‘foreman-nightly’ not ‘foreman-plugins-nightly’

ekohl · October 18, 2021, 1:57pm

I’d recommend using the script:

github.com

theforeman/foreman-packaging/blob/rpm/develop/rel-eng/compare-with-tags

#!/usr/bin/env python3
#
# Compares tito.props with koji and prints out differences in Github markup for
# review and cleanup.
#

from configparser import ConfigParser
from pathlib import Path
from subprocess import check_output
from typing import Set


def sclize(package: str, scl: str) -> str:
    if package.startswith(('rubygem-', 'nodejs-')):
        return f"{scl}-{package}"
    return package


def get_koji_packages(tag: str) -> Set[str]:
    command = ['koji', 'list-pkgs', f'--tag={tag}', '--quiet']

This file has been truncated. show original

There’s some thing that we currently don’t completely correctly generate (foreman-release being the most prominent). Other changes it suggests are often things we’ve missed.

system · October 25, 2021, 1:58pm

This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.