Is foreman-installer-staypuft ready for 1.6?

Support
1

This question I guess has 2 questions:

  1. Is staypuft stable enough to use in a Foreman 1.6 semi-production
    environment?

  2. Is Marek's foreman-installer-staypuft also good for a semi-production
    environment?

2

I only ask because it appears there is a foreman-installer-staypuft in the
'latest' plugins dir:

http://yum.theforeman.org/plugins/latest/el6/x86_64/foreman-installer-staypuft-0.1.7-1.el6.noarch.rpm

3

Hello,

staypuft won't work with foreman 1.6. You need 1.7 because of networking
changes. While foreman nightlies are quite stable I'm not sure I would
recommend running it in production. Staypuft itself changes very fast and I
would say it's ready for testing on CentOS. Same goes to foreman-installer-
staypuft. Yesterday I was able to install staypuft and start deployment on
CentOS just fine, but it didn't finish the installation because of my local
virtualization issues.

··· On Thursday 25 of September 2014 12:30:52 lawre wrote: > I only ask because it appears there is a foreman-installer-staypuft in the > 'latest' plugins dir: > > http://yum.theforeman.org/plugins/latest/el6/x86_64/foreman-installer-staypu > ft-0.1.7-1.el6.noarch.rpm

–
Marek

4

ok thanks for the report Marek. I will cross my fingers that staypuft will
be "done enough" when 1.7 is released.