Hello,
I have a RHEL5 server that I wish to hook up to Katello 2.0 is this even possible/practical ? I don’t seem to be able to find katello-agent 2 packages for RHEL5.
TIA
There is a client repo located here:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/releases/yum/2.0/client/RHEL/5/x86_64/
-Justin
···
On 12/21/2014 07:09 PM, Luke Kearney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a RHEL5 server that I wish to hook up to Katello 2.0 is this even possible/practical ? I don’t seem to be able to find katello-agent 2 packages for RHEL5.
>
> TIA
>
Justin,
Thanks for that - the system is now hooked up and functional. There is an issue with the signatures and the hashes of repodata.xml but I can see you have an open bug fix for that.
Kind Regards,
···
> On Dec 23, 2014, at 2:21 AM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
>
> On 12/21/2014 07:09 PM, Luke Kearney wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a RHEL5 server that I wish to hook up to Katello 2.0 is this even possible/practical ? I don’t seem to be able to find katello-agent 2 packages for RHEL5.
>>
>> TIA
>>
> There is a client repo located here: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/releases/yum/2.0/client/RHEL/5/x86_64/
>
> -Justin
Ahh thanks for the reminder, I had inquired about how to fix this but
haven't gotten an answer yet. I will inquire again.
I have fixed the script for 2.1 and nightly to start to generate 5Server
symlinks to the '5' directory in the same manner as 6Server and 7Server
is done.
Cheers!
-Justin
···
On 12/23/2014 12:24 AM, Luke Kearney wrote:
>> On Dec 23, 2014, at 2:21 AM, Justin Sherrill wrote:
>>
>> On 12/21/2014 07:09 PM, Luke Kearney wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have a RHEL5 server that I wish to hook up to Katello 2.0 is this even possible/practical ? I don’t seem to be able to find katello-agent 2 packages for RHEL5.
>>>
>>> TIA
>>>
>> There is a client repo located here: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/releases/yum/2.0/client/RHEL/5/x86_64/
>>
>> -Justin
> Justin,
>
> Thanks for that - the system is now hooked up and functional. There is an issue with the signatures and the hashes of repodata.xml but I can see you have an open bug fix for that.
>
> Kind Regards,
>