[Katello]

Hello,

I have a RHEL5 server that I wish to hook up to Katello 2.0 is this even possible/practical ? I don’t seem to be able to find katello-agent 2 packages for RHEL5.

TIA

There is a client repo located here:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/releases/yum/2.0/client/RHEL/5/x86_64/

-Justin

··· On 12/21/2014 07:09 PM, Luke Kearney wrote: > Hello, > > I have a RHEL5 server that I wish to hook up to Katello 2.0 is this even possible/practical ? I don’t seem to be able to find katello-agent 2 packages for RHEL5. > > TIA >

Justin,

Thanks for that - the system is now hooked up and functional. There is an issue with the signatures and the hashes of repodata.xml but I can see you have an open bug fix for that.

Kind Regards,

··· > On Dec 23, 2014, at 2:21 AM, Justin Sherrill wrote: > > On 12/21/2014 07:09 PM, Luke Kearney wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have a RHEL5 server that I wish to hook up to Katello 2.0 is this even possible/practical ? I don’t seem to be able to find katello-agent 2 packages for RHEL5. >> >> TIA >> > There is a client repo located here: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/releases/yum/2.0/client/RHEL/5/x86_64/ > > -Justin

Ahh thanks for the reminder, I had inquired about how to fix this but
haven't gotten an answer yet. I will inquire again.

I have fixed the script for 2.1 and nightly to start to generate 5Server
symlinks to the '5' directory in the same manner as 6Server and 7Server
is done.

Cheers!

-Justin

··· On 12/23/2014 12:24 AM, Luke Kearney wrote: >> On Dec 23, 2014, at 2:21 AM, Justin Sherrill wrote: >> >> On 12/21/2014 07:09 PM, Luke Kearney wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have a RHEL5 server that I wish to hook up to Katello 2.0 is this even possible/practical ? I don’t seem to be able to find katello-agent 2 packages for RHEL5. >>> >>> TIA >>> >> There is a client repo located here: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/katello/releases/yum/2.0/client/RHEL/5/x86_64/ >> >> -Justin > Justin, > > Thanks for that - the system is now hooked up and functional. There is an issue with the signatures and the hashes of repodata.xml but I can see you have an open bug fix for that. > > Kind Regards, >