The Katello team has been looking into a new navigation design that would
ultimately be adopted into Alchemy from the current version. I know the
current Alchemy header is a diversion from your current boostrap based
header, and these re-designs move more inline with the what you currently
have. In our efforts to provide consistency of user interactions, I'd like
ya'lls input.
After a few small iterations of implementation on my part, and discussion
back and forth with Kyle we have narrowed in on two that we would like your
feedback in choosing. These are not drastically different than what the
link above presents, and the functionality with regard to scrolling (i.e.
header collapsing and going with you) and dropdowns for sub-navigation
remains the same.
Definitely 2. If anyone says 1, they are against the wall when the
revolution happens!
···
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Eric D Helms wrote:
Howdy,
The Katello team has been looking into a new navigation design that would
ultimately be adopted into Alchemy from the current version. I know the
current Alchemy header is a diversion from your current boostrap based
header, and these re-designs move more inline with the what you currently
have. In our efforts to provide consistency of user interactions, I’d like
ya’lls input.
After a few small iterations of implementation on my part, and discussion
back and forth with Kyle we have narrowed in on two that we would like your
feedback in choosing. These are not drastically different than what the
link above presents, and the functionality with regard to scrolling (i.e.
header collapsing and going with you) and dropdowns for sub-navigation
remains the same.
I prefer 2nd variant simply because menu and content is more contrast. Variant
1 is also nice but it's harder to find where the page with content begins.
···
--
Marek
On Thursday 28 of March 2013 16:10:36 Eric D Helms wrote:
Howdy,
The Katello team has been looking into a new navigation design that would
ultimately be adopted into Alchemy from the current version. I know the
current Alchemy header is a diversion from your current boostrap based
header, and these re-designs move more inline with the what you currently
have. In our efforts to provide consistency of user interactions, I’d like
ya’lls input.
After a few small iterations of implementation on my part, and discussion
back and forth with Kyle we have narrowed in on two that we would like your
feedback in choosing. These are not drastically different than what the
link above presents, and the functionality with regard to scrolling (i.e.
header collapsing and going with you) and dropdowns for sub-navigation
remains the same.
Also like the version 2. Because it eats less pixels from the screen.
LZ
···
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:10:36PM -0400, Eric D Helms wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> The Katello team has been looking into a new navigation design that would
> ultimately be adopted into Alchemy from the current version. I know the
> current Alchemy header is a diversion from your current boostrap based
> header, and these re-designs move more inline with the what you currently
> have. In our efforts to provide consistency of user interactions, I'd like
> ya'lls input.
>
> Previous re-design of our header and navigation started with -
> https://fedorahosted.org/katello/wiki/Navigation%20Enhancements
>
> After a few small iterations of implementation on my part, and discussion
> back and forth with Kyle we have narrowed in on two that we would like your
> feedback in choosing. These are not drastically different than what the
> link above presents, and the functionality with regard to scrolling (i.e.
> header collapsing and going with you) and dropdowns for sub-navigation
> remains the same.
>
> So, just like the eye doctor would ask, better 1:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/katello/attachment/wiki/Navigation%20Enhancements/Screen-1.png
>
> or better 2:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/katello/attachment/wiki/Navigation%20Enhancements/Screen-2.png
>
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
Hi
number 2 is the winner for me. I like the contrast.
T.
···
On 03/28/2013 09:10 PM, Eric D Helms wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> The Katello team has been looking into a new navigation design that
> would ultimately be adopted into Alchemy from the current version. I
> know the current Alchemy header is a diversion from your current
> boostrap based header, and these re-designs move more inline with the
> what you currently have. In our efforts to provide consistency of user
> interactions, I'd like ya'lls input.
>
> Previous re-design of our header and navigation started with -
> https://fedorahosted.org/katello/wiki/Navigation%20Enhancements
>
> After a few small iterations of implementation on my part, and
> discussion back and forth with Kyle we have narrowed in on two that we
> would like your feedback in choosing. These are not drastically
> different than what the link above presents, and the functionality with
> regard to scrolling (i.e. header collapsing and going with you) and
> dropdowns for sub-navigation remains the same.
>
> So, just like the eye doctor would ask, better 1:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/katello/attachment/wiki/Navigation%20Enhancements/Screen-1.png
>
> or better 2:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/katello/attachment/wiki/Navigation%20Enhancements/Screen-2.png
>
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "foreman-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
2 works for me, as other have said, the contrast between the header and the
rest of the page is clearer.
···
On 29 March 2013 09:38, Tomas Strachota wrote:
Hi
number 2 is the winner for me. I like the contrast.
T.
On 03/28/2013 09:10 PM, Eric D Helms wrote:
Howdy,
The Katello team has been looking into a new navigation design that
would ultimately be adopted into Alchemy from the current version. I
know the current Alchemy header is a diversion from your current
boostrap based header, and these re-designs move more inline with the
what you currently have. In our efforts to provide consistency of user
interactions, I’d like ya’lls input.
After a few small iterations of implementation on my part, and
discussion back and forth with Kyle we have narrowed in on two that we
would like your feedback in choosing. These are not drastically
different than what the link above presents, and the functionality with
regard to scrolling (i.e. header collapsing and going with you) and
dropdowns for sub-navigation remains the same.
···
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Tomas Strachota wrote:
Hi
number 2 is the winner for me. I like the contrast.
T.
On 03/28/2013 09:10 PM, Eric D Helms wrote:
Howdy,
The Katello team has been looking into a new navigation design that
would ultimately be adopted into Alchemy from the current version. I
know the current Alchemy header is a diversion from your current
boostrap based header, and these re-designs move more inline with the
what you currently have. In our efforts to provide consistency of user
interactions, I’d like ya’lls input.
After a few small iterations of implementation on my part, and
discussion back and forth with Kyle we have narrowed in on two that we
would like your feedback in choosing. These are not drastically
different than what the link above presents, and the functionality with
regard to scrolling (i.e. header collapsing and going with you) and
dropdowns for sub-navigation remains the same.
Hi
number 2 is the winner for me. I like the contrast.
T.
On 03/28/2013 09:10 PM, Eric D Helms wrote:
Howdy,
The Katello team has been looking into a new navigation design that
would ultimately be adopted into Alchemy from the current version. I
know the current Alchemy header is a diversion from your current
boostrap based header, and these re-designs move more inline with the
what you currently have. In our efforts to provide consistency of user
interactions, I’d like ya’lls input.
After a few small iterations of implementation on my part, and
discussion back and forth with Kyle we have narrowed in on two that we
would like your feedback in choosing. These are not drastically
different than what the link above presents, and the functionality with
regard to scrolling (i.e. header collapsing and going with you) and
dropdowns for sub-navigation remains the same.
