Proper Categorization of bugs?

Development
1

I am trying to improve how we categorize bugs which are cloned upstream.
I am seeing a few groupings of bugs which I am not sure how to cetegorize.

Locations and Orgs : I was looking for a Taxonomy categgory, but did not
see one. Is it possible to create such a category?

Hosts Page : We have a category for host creation, but not host or host
page behaviour. Should I use "Inventory" for these types of bugs?

Thanks in advance!

– bk

2

> I am trying to improve how we categorize bugs which are cloned upstream.
> I am seeing a few groupings of bugs which I am not sure how to cetegorize.
>
> Locations and Orgs : I was looking for a Taxonomy categgory, but did not
> see one. Is it possible to create such a category?

Multi-Org.

> Hosts Page : We have a category for host creation, but not host or host
> page behaviour. Should I use "Inventory" for these types of bugs?

If it's the page behaviour, then it's Web Interface, else it's the most
specific category for the bug content.

··· On 07/02/16 11:40, Bryan Kearney wrote:

–
Dominic Cleal
dominic@cleal.org

3

>> I am trying to improve how we categorize bugs which are cloned upstream.
>> I am seeing a few groupings of bugs which I am not sure how to cetegorize.
>>
>> Locations and Orgs : I was looking for a Taxonomy categgory, but did not
>> see one. Is it possible to create such a category?
>
> Multi-Org.

I dont think locations when I think multi org. Would you be open to
"Taxonomies" or "Orgs and Locations" instead?

>
>> Hosts Page : We have a category for host creation, but not host or host
>> page behaviour. Should I use "Inventory" for these types of bugs?
>
> If it's the page behaviour, then it's Web Interface, else it's the most
> specific category for the bug content.

Agree, I was looking for that functional area. Would "Inventory" be correct?

– bk

··· On 02/08/2016 03:03 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote: > On 07/02/16 11:40, Bryan Kearney wrote:
4

>
>
>>> I am trying to improve how we categorize bugs which are cloned upstream.
>>> I am seeing a few groupings of bugs which I am not sure how to cetegorize.
>>>
>>> Locations and Orgs : I was looking for a Taxonomy categgory, but did not
>>> see one. Is it possible to create such a category?
>>
>> Multi-Org.
>
> I dont think locations when I think multi org. Would you be open to
> "Taxonomies" or "Orgs and Locations" instead?

Taxonomies is a code-only term. It could probably be renamed to Orgs
and Locations.

>>> Hosts Page : We have a category for host creation, but not host or host
>>> page behaviour. Should I use "Inventory" for these types of bugs?
>>
>> If it's the page behaviour, then it's Web Interface, else it's the most
>> specific category for the bug content.
>
> Agree, I was looking for that functional area. Would "Inventory" be correct?

Depends on the bug.

··· On 08/02/16 14:15, Bryan Kearney wrote: > On 02/08/2016 03:03 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote: >> On 07/02/16 11:40, Bryan Kearney wrote:

–
Dominic Cleal
dominic@cleal.org

5

WOuld you mind changing it to that? If so, I will do the same downstream
and start allocating bugs into that category.

Thanks!

– bk

··· On 02/08/2016 09:17 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote: > Taxonomies is a code-only term. It could probably be renamed to Orgs > and Locations.
6

Sure, done.

··· On 11/02/16 13:35, Bryan Kearney wrote: > > On 02/08/2016 09:17 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote: >> Taxonomies is a code-only term. It could probably be renamed to Orgs >> and Locations. > > WOuld you mind changing it to that?

–
Dominic Cleal
dominic@cleal.org