Strawpoll - Switching the community demo to a monthly timeframe

Hi all

(apologies for cross-posting)

I'm thinking about ways to shake up the community demo slightly. It
occurred to me that the 3-week timeframe is somewhat odd if you don't know
the history of the team (i.e. that the full-time devs used to use
scrum/sprint methodologies, and the community demo grew out of the sprint
demo).

However, we no longer really do sprint in that way, and that takes some of
the constraints off the demo now. Moving to a monthly demo would make for a
more predictable schedule (say, first thursday of the month), and would
allow a larger period to generate useful/interesting features. This is
particularly relevant given the paucity of content over the last few demos
(although the timely merge of Dmitri's Puppet 4 proxy support saved me
yesterday :P). There's also the possibility to base the newsletter off the
demo, or vice versa, since both will be monthly.

The only potential downside I can see is contributors forgetting what they
worked on a month ago, or at least how to demo it, but that's not a huge
problem.

So what do you think? Is monthly better for you, or do you prefer the
3-weekly format? The poll is here:

(credit to Daniel for bringing this site to my attention in his
Azure/HyperV poll - much better than the previous strawpoll I used!)

··· -- Greg IRC: gwmngilfen

That's kind of a big problem for me - frequent reminders on IRC
to put things in the current sprint info page
http://projects.theforeman.org/projects/foreman/wiki/Current_Sprint_Information
page would help :slight_smile:

··· On 05/20, Greg Sutcliffe wrote: > (apologies for cross-posting) > The only potential downside I can see is contributors forgetting what they > worked on a month ago, or at least how to demo it, but that's not a huge > problem.


Daniel Lobato Garcia

@dLobatog
blog.daniellobato.me
daniellobato.me

GPG: http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A92D6DD38D6DE30
Keybase: https://keybase.io/elobato

Cycling around to this now that it's had a while to run - it seems 88% (ok,
sample size of just 17 replies :P) are in favour of monthly. There are a
few other considerations, so I'll get thinking about that and make a
decision in the near future.

··· On 23 May 2016 at 11:43, Daniel Lobato Garcia wrote:

That’s kind of a big problem for me - frequent reminders on IRC
to put things in the current sprint info page

Current Sprint Information - Foreman
page would help :slight_smile:

If that’s helpful, then I’ll see what I can do. Perhaps nudnik should
respond to GitHub notifications :stuck_out_tongue: