Support for Ruby 1.9.3 and Fog gem

Development
1

As from a week ago, Fog officially dropped support for Ruby 1.9.3 (commit
on Fog
<https://github.com/fog/fog/commit/8a413ef54a82e902c59e1e277a38ffe91a466968>
).

IMHO, that means Foreman has to decide either we pin down to a specific
version of Fog, or we begin moving our project toward support for Ruby 2.0+.
Not doing either of those options will lead to a dependency mess (and
eventually a broken code).

Comments? Ideas?

Shim.

2

Sure, could do. Refactor #8884: Drop Ruby 1.9.3 support - Foreman tracks it,
we'd need a plan for each listed OS.

··· On 06/10/15 09:57, sshtein@redhat.com wrote: > As from a week ago, Fog officially dropped support for Ruby 1.9.3 (commit > on Fog > > ). > > IMHO, that means Foreman has to decide either we pin down to a specific > version of Fog, or we begin moving our project toward support for Ruby 2.0+.

–
Dominic Cleal
dominic@cleal.org

3

> As from a week ago, Fog officially dropped support for Ruby 1.9.3 (commit
> on Fog
> <https://github.com/fog/fog/commit/8a413ef54a82e902c59e1e277a38ffe91a466968>
> ).
>
> IMHO, that means Foreman has to decide either we pin down to a specific
> version of Fog, or we begin moving our project toward support for Ruby 2.0+.
> Not doing either of those options will lead to a dependency mess (and
> eventually a broken code).
>
> Comments? Ideas?
>
> My assumption is that rails 4.x upgrade also include a new version of ruby
2.x?

Ohad

··· On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:57 AM, wrote:

Shim.

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

4

Hi,

··· On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:46:18AM +0100, Dominic Cleal wrote: > > IMHO, that means Foreman has to decide either we pin down to a specific > > version of Fog, or we begin moving our project toward support for Ruby 2.0+. > > Sure, could do. http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/8884 tracks it, > we'd need a plan for each listed OS.

As a very short estimation: I guess we’d have to drop support for
Debian/wheezy, Ubuntu/trusty is bringing ruby2.0 packages and there’s
also https://www.brightbox.com/docs/ruby/ubuntu/

Regards

Michael Moll

5

Would we want to use the existing Rails 4 SCL? If so we need ruby 2.2.

https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/rh-ror41/

David

··· On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Ohad Levy wrote:

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:57 AM, sshtein@redhat.com wrote:

As from a week ago, Fog officially dropped support for Ruby 1.9.3 (commit
on Fog
https://github.com/fog/fog/commit/8a413ef54a82e902c59e1e277a38ffe91a466968
).

IMHO, that means Foreman has to decide either we pin down to a specific
version of Fog, or we begin moving our project toward support for Ruby 2.0+.
Not doing either of those options will lead to a dependency mess (and
eventually a broken code).

Comments? Ideas?

My assumption is that rails 4.x upgrade also include a new version of
ruby 2.x?

Ohad

Shim.

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.