No, I'm fine with removing it. I stopped maintaining it a few releases
ago as merging in releases was unreliable due to the cherry picks on
*-stable branches. It was occasionally resulting in duplicated code,
but I've not tried it with a more recent git version.
I don't think it's particularly valuable, and I'd rather forget about it.
···
On 26/08/15 09:48, sshtein@redhat.com wrote:
> Since we are not using the master branch
> from 2013 (foreman
> 1.2), I think it's about a time to remove this branch from the Git
> repository.
>
> Does anyone see the benefit in keeping it?
Thanks for raising the topic, I've deleted the branch.
···
On 26/08/15 09:48, sshtein@redhat.com wrote:
> Since we are not using the master branch
> from 2013 (foreman
> 1.2), I think it's about a time to remove this branch from the Git
> repository.
>
> Does anyone see the benefit in keeping it?
Saved many developers that do not drink coffee from frustrating errors
···
On Wednesday, August 26, 2015 at 3:05:36 PM UTC+3, Dominic Cleal wrote:
>
> On 26/08/15 09:48, ssh...@redhat.com wrote:
> > Since we are not using the master branch
> > from 2013 (foreman
> > 1.2), I think it's about a time to remove this branch from the Git
> > repository.
> >
> > Does anyone see the benefit in keeping it?
>
> Thanks for raising the topic, I've deleted the branch.
>
> --
> Dominic Cleal
> Red Hat Engineering
>
> > Since we are not using the master branch
> > <https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/tree/master> from 2013 (foreman
> > 1.2), I think it's about a time to remove this branch from the Git
> > repository.
> >
> > Does anyone see the benefit in keeping it?
>
> No, I'm fine with removing it. I stopped maintaining it a few releases
> ago as merging in releases was unreliable due to the cherry picks on
> *-stable branches. It was occasionally resulting in duplicated code,
> but I've not tried it with a more recent git version.
>
> I don't think it's particularly valuable, and I'd rather forget about it.
>
+1
Ohad
···
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Dominic Cleal wrote:
> On 26/08/15 09:48, sshtein@redhat.com wrote: