Foreman 1.3 codename final vote

Support
1

Hello,

so few of us added own suggestions for the next codename, few of us
already voted.

I am giving us the next week for putting all votes in for the following
finalists (in no particular order):

Andrew
Lion
Panther
Noggin
Birdie
Shovel

Vote here: http://etherpad-domcleal.rhcloud.com/p/foreman-1.3-codename

Thanks!

··· -- Later,

Lukas “lzap” Zapletal
irc: lzap #theforeman

2

+1 to using numbers

··· ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Sutcliffe" To: "Foreman ." , "Foreman ." Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:58:15 AM Subject: [foreman-users] Re: [foreman-dev] Foreman 1.3 codename final vote

On 1 August 2013 09:38, Lukas Zapletal lzap@redhat.com wrote:

Hello,

so few of us added own suggestions for the next codename, few of us
already voted.

You’re missing an option - no release name. I don’t want one.

We’ve never had one before, and I find “1.3” a perfectly usable identifier.
I’ve gotten very annoyed with Ubuntu over the years, because I have to go
find a table of release names every time it’s gets mentioned. If people
just said “12.10” instead of “Quantal” I’d know what I was dealing with,
without having to go to Wikipedia first. I don’t want to be doing that with
Foreman as well. Numbers are fine.

Greg

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Foreman users” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

3

I tend to be in the numbers only camp for Foreman, since that's our
history. However, I am open to hearing arguments for practical reasons
to use codenames?

Thanks,
Brian

··· > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Greg Sutcliffe" > To: "Foreman ." , "Foreman ." > Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:58:15 AM > Subject: [foreman-users] Re: [foreman-dev] Foreman 1.3 codename final vote > > On 1 August 2013 09:38, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> so few of us added own suggestions for the next codename, few of us >> already voted. >> > > You're missing an option - no release name. I don't want one. > > We've never had one before, and I find "1.3" a perfectly usable identifier. > I've gotten *very* annoyed with Ubuntu over the years, because I have to go > find a table of release names every time it's gets mentioned. If people > just said "12.10" instead of "Quantal" I'd know what I was dealing with, > without having to go to Wikipedia first. I don't want to be doing that with > Foreman as well. Numbers are fine. > > Greg
4

You're missing an option - no release name. I don't want one.

We've never had one before, and I find "1.3" a perfectly usable identifier.
I've gotten very annoyed with Ubuntu over the years, because I have to go
find a table of release names every time it's gets mentioned. If people
just said "12.10" instead of "Quantal" I'd know what I was dealing with,
without having to go to Wikipedia first. I don't want to be doing that with
Foreman as well. Numbers are fine.

Greg

··· On 1 August 2013 09:38, Lukas Zapletal wrote:

Hello,

so few of us added own suggestions for the next codename, few of us
already voted.

5

+1 for numbers !

··· 2013/8/1 Brian Gupta

----- Original Message -----
From: “Greg Sutcliffe” greg.sutcliffe@gmail.com
To: “Foreman .” foreman-dev@googlegroups.com, “Foreman .” <
foreman-users@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:58:15 AM
Subject: [foreman-users] Re: [foreman-dev] Foreman 1.3 codename final
vote

On 1 August 2013 09:38, Lukas Zapletal lzap@redhat.com wrote:

Hello,

so few of us added own suggestions for the next codename, few of us
already voted.

You’re missing an option - no release name. I don’t want one.

We’ve never had one before, and I find “1.3” a perfectly usable
identifier.
I’ve gotten very annoyed with Ubuntu over the years, because I have to
go
find a table of release names every time it’s gets mentioned. If people
just said “12.10” instead of “Quantal” I’d know what I was dealing with,
without having to go to Wikipedia first. I don’t want to be doing that
with
Foreman as well. Numbers are fine.

Greg

I tend to be in the numbers only camp for Foreman, since that’s our
history. However, I am open to hearing arguments for practical reasons
to use codenames?

Thanks,
Brian

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“Foreman users” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

6

+1 for numbers !

··· On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Romain Vrignaud wrote:

+1 for numbers !

2013/8/1 Brian Gupta brian.gupta@brandorr.com

----- Original Message -----
From: “Greg Sutcliffe” greg.sutcliffe@gmail.com
To: “Foreman .” foreman-dev@googlegroups.com, “Foreman .” foreman-users@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:58:15 AM
Subject: [foreman-users] Re: [foreman-dev] Foreman 1.3 codename final vote

On 1 August 2013 09:38, Lukas Zapletal lzap@redhat.com wrote:

Hello,

so few of us added own suggestions for the next codename, few of us
already voted.

You’re missing an option - no release name. I don’t want one.

We’ve never had one before, and I find “1.3” a perfectly usable identifier.
I’ve gotten very annoyed with Ubuntu over the years, because I have to go
find a table of release names every time it’s gets mentioned. If people
just said “12.10” instead of “Quantal” I’d know what I was dealing with,
without having to go to Wikipedia first. I don’t want to be doing that with
Foreman as well. Numbers are fine.

Greg

I tend to be in the numbers only camp for Foreman, since that’s our
history. However, I am open to hearing arguments for practical reasons
to use codenames?

Thanks,
Brian

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Foreman users” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Foreman users” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

7

Another vote for numbers.

··· On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Luke Kearney wrote:

+1 for numbers !

On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Romain Vrignaud rvrignaud@gmail.com wrote:

+1 for numbers !

2013/8/1 Brian Gupta brian.gupta@brandorr.com

----- Original Message -----
From: “Greg Sutcliffe” greg.sutcliffe@gmail.com
To: “Foreman .” foreman-dev@googlegroups.com, “Foreman .” <
foreman-users@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:58:15 AM
Subject: [foreman-users] Re: [foreman-dev] Foreman 1.3 codename final
vote

On 1 August 2013 09:38, Lukas Zapletal lzap@redhat.com wrote:

Hello,

so few of us added own suggestions for the next codename, few of us
already voted.

You’re missing an option - no release name. I don’t want one.

We’ve never had one before, and I find “1.3” a perfectly usable
identifier.
I’ve gotten very annoyed with Ubuntu over the years, because I have
to go
find a table of release names every time it’s gets mentioned. If people
just said “12.10” instead of “Quantal” I’d know what I was dealing with,
without having to go to Wikipedia first. I don’t want to be doing that
with
Foreman as well. Numbers are fine.

Greg

I tend to be in the numbers only camp for Foreman, since that’s our
history. However, I am open to hearing arguments for practical reasons
to use codenames?

Thanks,
Brian

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“Foreman users” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“Foreman users” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“Foreman users” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

8

I take this as my failure of explaining codename properly. The intention
was not to replace version numbers at all, in the Ubuntu style, but to
complement release notes only.

Anyway, voting cancelled. Thanks for your opinions.

LZ

··· On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:02:38PM +0300, Ohad Levy wrote: > Community has spoken > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Josh Baird wrote: > > > Another vote for numbers. > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Luke Kearney wrote: > > > >> +1 for numbers ! > >> > >> On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Romain Vrignaud wrote: > >> > >> +1 for numbers ! > >> > >> > >> 2013/8/1 Brian Gupta > >> > >>> > ----- Original Message ----- > >>> > From: "Greg Sutcliffe" > >>> > To: "Foreman ." , "Foreman ." < > >>> foreman-users@googlegroups.com> > >>> > Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:58:15 AM > >>> > Subject: [foreman-users] Re: [foreman-dev] Foreman 1.3 codename final > >>> vote > >>> > > >>> > On 1 August 2013 09:38, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> Hello, > >>> >> > >>> >> so few of us added own suggestions for the next codename, few of us > >>> >> already voted. > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > You're missing an option - no release name. I don't want one. > >>> > > >>> > We've never had one before, and I find "1.3" a perfectly usable > >>> identifier. > >>> > I've gotten *very* annoyed with Ubuntu over the years, because I have > >>> to go > >>> > find a table of release names every time it's gets mentioned. If people > >>> > just said "12.10" instead of "Quantal" I'd know what I was dealing > >>> with, > >>> > without having to go to Wikipedia first. I don't want to be doing that > >>> with > >>> > Foreman as well. Numbers are fine. > >>> > > >>> > Greg > >>> > >>> I tend to be in the numbers only camp for Foreman, since that's our > >>> history. However, I am open to hearing arguments for practical reasons > >>> to use codenames? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Brian > >>> > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>> Groups "Foreman users" group. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > >>> an email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >>> To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com. > >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. > >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "Foreman users" group. > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > >> email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >> To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com. > >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "Foreman users" group. > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > >> email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >> To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com. > >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Foreman users" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Foreman users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > >

–
Later,

Lukas “lzap” Zapletal
irc: lzap #theforeman

9

Community has spoken

··· On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Josh Baird wrote:

Another vote for numbers.

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Luke Kearney luke@kearney.jp wrote:

+1 for numbers !

On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Romain Vrignaud rvrignaud@gmail.com wrote:

+1 for numbers !

2013/8/1 Brian Gupta brian.gupta@brandorr.com

----- Original Message -----
From: “Greg Sutcliffe” greg.sutcliffe@gmail.com
To: “Foreman .” foreman-dev@googlegroups.com, “Foreman .” <
foreman-users@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:58:15 AM
Subject: [foreman-users] Re: [foreman-dev] Foreman 1.3 codename final
vote

On 1 August 2013 09:38, Lukas Zapletal lzap@redhat.com wrote:

Hello,

so few of us added own suggestions for the next codename, few of us
already voted.

You’re missing an option - no release name. I don’t want one.

We’ve never had one before, and I find “1.3” a perfectly usable
identifier.
I’ve gotten very annoyed with Ubuntu over the years, because I have
to go
find a table of release names every time it’s gets mentioned. If people
just said “12.10” instead of “Quantal” I’d know what I was dealing
with,
without having to go to Wikipedia first. I don’t want to be doing that
with
Foreman as well. Numbers are fine.

Greg

I tend to be in the numbers only camp for Foreman, since that’s our
history. However, I am open to hearing arguments for practical reasons
to use codenames?

Thanks,
Brian

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups “Foreman users” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“Foreman users” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“Foreman users” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“Foreman users” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.