several times we had requests from the community to add icons for OSes
like Solaris, AIX or Oracle Linux. Due to copyright and trademarks, we
can't do that. Instead, we were using custom made icons.
I had this little plan of making a script that would generate
foreman-sized icons (21x21) for this purpose. Today I asked on the
Fedora list and the script is here:
Check it out, tell me what you think. We can change the look and feel of
the icons if you don't like it, but I like the idea we now have (legally
correct and licensed - GNU GPL) place to get our icons from.
···
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
Hello,
several times we had requests from the community to add icons for OSes
like Solaris, AIX or Oracle Linux. Due to copyright and trademarks, we
can’t do that. Instead, we were using custom made icons.
I had this little plan of making a script that would generate
foreman-sized icons (21x21) for this purpose. Today I asked on the
Fedora list and the script is here:
Check it out, tell me what you think. We can change the look and feel of
the icons if you don’t like it, but I like the idea we now have (legally
correct and licensed - GNU GPL) place to get our icons from.
> Hello,
>
> several times we had requests from the community to add icons for OSes
> like Solaris, AIX or Oracle Linux. Due to copyright and trademarks, we
> can't do that. Instead, we were using custom made icons.
>
> I had this little plan of making a script that would generate
> foreman-sized icons (21x21) for this purpose. Today I asked on the
> Fedora list and the script is here:
>
> GitHub - lzap/foreman-dummy-icons: Dummy icons for Foreman project
>
> Check it out, tell me what you think. We can change the look and feel of
> the icons if you don't like it, but I like the idea we now have (legally
> correct and licensed - GNU GPL) place to get our icons from.
>
> ps - to see all the icons on one page go to:
>
>
> Initial version · lzap/foreman-dummy-icons@708fbcf · GitHub
any chance to change the icons to be round? this would be in line with
other os icons and do not conflict with the status letters we currently
have infront of the hostname?
thanks,
Ohad
···
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> > I like the idea, anyway, wouldn't using a 21x21 logo fall under fair
> > use? I'm probably missing some background on the topic here.
> >
> > File:Solaris OS logo.svg - Wikipedia (see comments)
>
> "Fair use" depends on your jurisdiction. My understanding of the is
> that there's no equivalent provision in the UK, for example.
>
While sorting out the legal issues, which I think are sortable, could we
ship a helper script that grabs and imports appropriate icons for stuff we
aren't sure about yet?
···
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote:
> On 30/06/14 13:56, Daniel Lobato wrote:
"Fair use" depends on your jurisdiction. My understanding of the is
that there's no equivalent provision in the UK, for example.
···
On 30/06/14 13:56, Daniel Lobato wrote:
> I like the idea, anyway, wouldn't using a 21x21 logo fall under fair
> use? I'm probably missing some background on the topic here.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Solaris_OS_logo.svg (see comments)
> > > I like the idea, anyway, wouldn't using a 21x21 logo fall under fair
> > > use? I'm probably missing some background on the topic here.
> > >
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Solaris_OS_logo.svg (see comments)
> >
> > "Fair use" depends on your jurisdiction. My understanding of the is
> > that there's no equivalent provision in the UK, for example.
It was confirmed by the Red Hat Legal that we are not safe to distribute
under "fair use", if I understand that correctly.
> While sorting out the legal issues, which I think are sortable, could we
> ship a helper script that grabs and imports appropriate icons for stuff we
> aren't sure about yet?
Good idea, that's something we should be able to distribute. I think I
will leave that to someone else for now.
> any chance to change the icons to be round? this would be in line with
> other os icons and do not conflict with the status letters we currently
> have infront of the hostname?
