I think there is misunderstanding and the thread deviated to 2.0
feature discussion. This is not core of my proposal, I explicitly do
not want to do feature talk. There will always be something that we
would like to have in version X.Y. What I propose is:
A) Let's do 2.0 instead 1.17 regardless of features
B) Let's do 2.0 instead 1.18 regardless of features
C) Let's do 2.0 instead 1.19 regardless of features
D) I want to stick with 1.X, talk about feature-driven release
management or simply decide later
And it's totally fair if you guys prefer to talk about features and
decide later. This is just my attempt to set the direction back, but
it looks like I already know where this is going anyways :-)
At least I tried and opened the discussion so we don't hit the wall of
"twenty"...
Ok, gmail did not refresh me the thread, I was reading old posts.
D) I want to stick with 1.X, talk about feature-driven release
management or simply decide later
It looks like majority want to continue the discussion, please carry on there.
There are some voices that vertical nav with Rails 5.x might be a good
reason to do 2.0, but Eric preferred also to include V1 drop.
Also one interesting remark was that we don't need to rush and it does
not make any huge difference if we switch 1.17 or 1.19, that's also
worth mentioning.
