Ohad and I were just talking in #theforeman-dev [1] about issues that are going to arise with the proxy for larger installations. At some point we're going to need to have a better approach to scaling the proxy and making it asynchronous. This wouldn't really be a great deep-dive discussion since we don't have anything to show yet, but I think it'd be cool to talk about future architecture for the proxy in a hangout.
Are people interested in scheduling something for this week to get the ball rolling on this?
-Sam
- https://gist.github.com/skottler/69afc4615cfd88dfcbe2
Definitely. The single-thread nature is of interest to my work on the
templates, since it cannot current listen on both http and https, so a
multi-thread solution would be useful there too.
···
On 7 September 2013 20:09, Sam Kottler wrote:
Ohad and I were just talking in #theforeman-dev [1] about issues that are
going to arise with the proxy for larger installations. At some point we’re
going to need to have a better approach to scaling the proxy and making it
asynchronous. This wouldn’t really be a great deep-dive discussion since we
don’t have anything to show yet, but I think it’d be cool to talk about
future architecture for the proxy in a hangout.
Are people interested in scheduling something for this week to get the
ball rolling on this?
I think that's a good idea. If we decide to have a chat, could we postpone
it for the week after next, I'd love to participate?
-d
···
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Greg Sutcliffe wrote:
On 7 September 2013 20:09, Sam Kottler skottler@redhat.com wrote:
Ohad and I were just talking in #theforeman-dev [1] about issues that are
going to arise with the proxy for larger installations. At some point we’re
going to need to have a better approach to scaling the proxy and making it
asynchronous. This wouldn’t really be a great deep-dive discussion since we
don’t have anything to show yet, but I think it’d be cool to talk about
future architecture for the proxy in a hangout.
Are people interested in scheduling something for this week to get the
ball rolling on this?
Definitely. The single-thread nature is of interest to my work on the
templates, since it cannot current listen on both http and https, so a
multi-thread solution would be useful there too.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> From: "Dmitri Dolguikh" <witlessbird@gmail.com>
> To: foreman-dev@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:06:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [foreman-dev] Proxy architecture discussion
>
> I think that's a good idea. If we decide to have a chat, could we postpone
> it for the week after next, I'd love to participate?
Sounds good - how about Wednesday (the 18th) and 9:30am eastern?
···
----- Original Message -----
-d
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Greg Sutcliffe > greg.sutcliffe@gmail.comwrote:
On 7 September 2013 20:09, Sam Kottler skottler@redhat.com wrote:
Ohad and I were just talking in #theforeman-dev [1] about issues that are
going to arise with the proxy for larger installations. At some point
we’re
going to need to have a better approach to scaling the proxy and making it
asynchronous. This wouldn’t really be a great deep-dive discussion since
we
don’t have anything to show yet, but I think it’d be cool to talk about
future architecture for the proxy in a hangout.
Are people interested in scheduling something for this week to get the
ball rolling on this?
Definitely. The single-thread nature is of interest to my work on the
templates, since it cannot current listen on both http and https, so a
multi-thread solution would be useful there too.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Sept 18th is next week :). Although if you think it's worth it to have the
conversation sooner rather than later, then could you record it?
Cheers,
-d
···
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Sam Kottler wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: “Dmitri Dolguikh” witlessbird@gmail.com
To: foreman-dev@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:06:32 AM
Subject: Re: [foreman-dev] Proxy architecture discussion
I think that’s a good idea. If we decide to have a chat, could we
postpone
it for the week after next, I’d love to participate?
Sounds good - how about Wednesday (the 18th) and 9:30am eastern?
-d
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Greg Sutcliffe > > greg.sutcliffe@gmail.comwrote:
On 7 September 2013 20:09, Sam Kottler skottler@redhat.com wrote:
Ohad and I were just talking in #theforeman-dev [1] about issues that
are
going to arise with the proxy for larger installations. At some point
we’re
going to need to have a better approach to scaling the proxy and
making it
asynchronous. This wouldn’t really be a great deep-dive discussion
since
we
don’t have anything to show yet, but I think it’d be cool to talk
about
future architecture for the proxy in a hangout.
Are people interested in scheduling something for this week to get the
ball rolling on this?
Definitely. The single-thread nature is of interest to my work on the
templates, since it cannot current listen on both http and https, so a
multi-thread solution would be useful there too.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> From: "Dmitri Dolguikh" <witlessbird@gmail.com>
> To: foreman-dev@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:10:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [foreman-dev] Proxy architecture discussion
>
> Sept 18th is next week :). Although if you think it's worth it to have the
> conversation sooner rather than later, then could you record it?
Whoop, meant the 25th.
···
----- Original Message -----
Cheers,
-d
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Sam Kottler skottler@redhat.com wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: “Dmitri Dolguikh” witlessbird@gmail.com
To: foreman-dev@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:06:32 AM
Subject: Re: [foreman-dev] Proxy architecture discussion
I think that’s a good idea. If we decide to have a chat, could we
postpone
it for the week after next, I’d love to participate?
Sounds good - how about Wednesday (the 18th) and 9:30am eastern?
-d
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Greg Sutcliffe > > > greg.sutcliffe@gmail.comwrote:
On 7 September 2013 20:09, Sam Kottler skottler@redhat.com wrote:
Ohad and I were just talking in #theforeman-dev [1] about issues that
are
going to arise with the proxy for larger installations. At some point
we’re
going to need to have a better approach to scaling the proxy and
making it
asynchronous. This wouldn’t really be a great deep-dive discussion
since
we
don’t have anything to show yet, but I think it’d be cool to talk
about
future architecture for the proxy in a hangout.
Are people interested in scheduling something for this week to get the
ball rolling on this?
Definitely. The single-thread nature is of interest to my work on the
templates, since it cannot current listen on both http and https, so a
multi-thread solution would be useful there too.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
> > From: "Dmitri Dolguikh" <witlessbird@gmail.com>
> > To: foreman-dev@googlegroups.com
> > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 9:10:50 AM
> > Subject: Re: [foreman-dev] Proxy architecture discussion
> >
> > Sept 18th is next week :). Although if you think it's worth it to have
> the
> > conversation sooner rather than later, then could you record it?
>
> Whoop, meant the 25th.
>
wfm.
-d
···
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Sam Kottler wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
Cheers,
-d
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Sam Kottler skottler@redhat.com > wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: “Dmitri Dolguikh” witlessbird@gmail.com
To: foreman-dev@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:06:32 AM
Subject: Re: [foreman-dev] Proxy architecture discussion
I think that’s a good idea. If we decide to have a chat, could we
postpone
it for the week after next, I’d love to participate?
Sounds good - how about Wednesday (the 18th) and 9:30am eastern?
-d
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Greg Sutcliffe > > > > greg.sutcliffe@gmail.comwrote:
On 7 September 2013 20:09, Sam Kottler skottler@redhat.com > wrote:
Ohad and I were just talking in #theforeman-dev [1] about issues
that
are
going to arise with the proxy for larger installations. At some
point
we’re
going to need to have a better approach to scaling the proxy and
making it
asynchronous. This wouldn’t really be a great deep-dive discussion
since
we
don’t have anything to show yet, but I think it’d be cool to talk
about
future architecture for the proxy in a hangout.
Are people interested in scheduling something for this week to
get the
ball rolling on this?
Definitely. The single-thread nature is of interest to my work on
the
templates, since it cannot current listen on both http and https,
so a
multi-thread solution would be useful there too.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send
an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
–
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
“foreman-dev” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>> Whoop, meant the 25th.
>>
>
No immediate objection to that…
···
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Sam Kottler wrote:
