Today we merged and updated both Redmine and the prprocessor to support
multiple pull requests for a given issue. For those that use the pull
request field on Redmine issues, this means that if multiple pull requests
have targeted a given issue through fixes/refs, the pull request field
should now record and display all associated. If you see issues with this
functionality, or unexpected behavior from the prprocessor please let us
know!
···
--
Eric D. Helms
Red Hat Engineering
Ph.D. Student - North Carolina State University
···
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Eric D Helms wrote:
All,
Today we merged and updated both Redmine and the prprocessor to support
multiple pull requests for a given issue. For those that use the pull
request field on Redmine issues, this means that if multiple pull requests
have targeted a given issue through fixes/refs, the pull request field
should now record and display all associated. If you see issues with this
functionality, or unexpected behavior from the prprocessor please let us
know!
–
Eric D. Helms
Red Hat Engineering
Ph.D. Student - North Carolina State University
The service had a few errors over the weekend as it wasn't updating
Redmine tickets correctly.
I've now fixed this and redelivered all failed GitHub webhooks on
theforeman/foreman, but please check that your open PRs are correctly
labelled if you've recently updated them.
···
On 30/10/15 14:53, Eric D Helms wrote:
> All,
>
> Today we merged and updated both Redmine and the prprocessor to support
> multiple pull requests for a given issue. For those that use the pull
> request field on Redmine issues, this means that if multiple pull
> requests have targeted a given issue through fixes/refs, the pull
> request field should now record and display all associated. If you see
> issues with this functionality, or unexpected behavior from the
> prprocessor please let us know!
···
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Tomer Brisker wrote:
I just had one of my issues reassigned to lzap because he added a PR that
refs it (http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/8800), the prprocessor
should only assign the issue to the PR author if it’s the first PR for the
issue.
Today we merged and updated both Redmine and the prprocessor to support
multiple pull requests for a given issue. For those that use the pull
request field on Redmine issues, this means that if multiple pull requests
have targeted a given issue through fixes/refs, the pull request field
should now record and display all associated. If you see issues with this
functionality, or unexpected behavior from the prprocessor please let us
know!
–
Eric D. Helms
Red Hat Engineering
Ph.D. Student - North Carolina State University
···
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Dominic Cleal wrote:
On 30/10/15 14:53, Eric D Helms wrote:
All,
Today we merged and updated both Redmine and the prprocessor to support
multiple pull requests for a given issue. For those that use the pull
request field on Redmine issues, this means that if multiple pull
requests have targeted a given issue through fixes/refs, the pull
request field should now record and display all associated. If you see
issues with this functionality, or unexpected behavior from the
prprocessor please let us know!
The service had a few errors over the weekend as it wasn’t updating
Redmine tickets correctly.
I’ve now fixed this and redelivered all failed GitHub webhooks on
theforeman/foreman, but please check that your open PRs are correctly
labelled if you’ve recently updated them.
The PR hasn't been updated (triggering a GitHub "synchronised" webhook)
since the title was changed. Change the title and then push to the
branch and it would have updated.
···
On 17/11/15 20:11, David Davis wrote:
> Is this a known issue of the PR processor? It looks like when you update
> a PR it doesn’t get assigned or reassigned to the correct issue:
>
> https://github.com/Katello/katello/pull/5574
>
> This PR should be assigned to this issue:
>
> http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/12331
>
> But it’s on this one instead:
>
> http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/10970