which compares our whitelists agains koji. The first phase is packages
added to tags. It was used to generate this wiki page where I want to
track review process. The same script can be modified to generate koji
commands to remove/add packages. I am currently starting with review:
If you spot a package name that should not be added or removed, please
uncheck it and make a comment in the gist or here:
Most of the packages are simply either subpackage which should not be
present (we add only source package names) or packages that should not
be both in nonscl-scl or core-plugin. And then there's the rest.
For example I found mod_passenger to be removed but I believe this is
correctly tagged (we carry this dependency in our repos), so I
unchecked. I will carry on tomorrow with review.
If you reviewed all the packages please let me know here or in the gist. Thanks
This is the first stage, the next would be review of tags, I don't
know yet how to do that one. If anyone have an idea how to automate
that, let me know.
I deleted about 1800 packages which were obvious to me (subpackages,
wrong packages tfm vs nonscl), added few missing. Here is full log:
I am still in doubt with few of others (mostly passenger and
tfm/tfm-build packages). Do you see something incorrect on this list?
If not, I will go ahead and execute the rest on Monday.
Updated version of my script is at
···
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I created a small script
>
> https://gist.github.com/lzap/cc6c100feb0a558f961eaa07e01bfa59
>
> which compares our whitelists agains koji. The first phase is packages
> added to tags. It was used to generate this wiki page where I want to
> track review process. The same script can be modified to generate koji
> commands to remove/add packages. I am currently starting with review:
>
> If you spot a package name that should not be added or removed, please
> uncheck it and make a comment in the gist or here:
>
> https://gist.github.com/lzap/0e0ee1a7f11ccd9eaba45282391862a6
>
> Most of the packages are simply either subpackage which should not be
> present (we add only source package names) or packages that should not
> be both in nonscl-scl or core-plugin. And then there's the rest.
>
> For example I found mod_passenger to be removed but I believe this is
> correctly tagged (we carry this dependency in our repos), so I
> unchecked. I will carry on tomorrow with review.
>
> If you reviewed all the packages please let me know here or in the gist. Thanks
>
> This is the first stage, the next would be review of tags, I don't
> know yet how to do that one. If anyone have an idea how to automate
> that, let me know.
>
>
> --
> Later,
> Lukas @lzap Zapletal
2017-06-19 12:20:56 [WARNING ] rubygem-fog-libvirt-doc not in
comps-foreman-fedora24.xml
2017-06-19 12:20:56 [WARNING ] No build for package
rubygem-librarian-puppet in package listing for tag
foreman-nightly-fedora24-dist
2017-06-19 12:20:56 [WARNING ] No build for package
rubygem-therubyracer in package listing for tag
foreman-nightly-fedora24-dist
2017-06-19 12:20:56 [WARNING ] No build for package
rubygem-strong_parameters in package listing for tag
foreman-nightly-fedora24-dist
And el7:
2017-06-19 12:20:27 [WARNING ] In comps but not in
foreman-nightly/RHEL/7 tree: rubygem-rdoc
2017-06-19 12:20:27 [WARNING ] rubygem-passenger-devel not in
comps-foreman-rhel7.xml
2017-06-19 12:20:27 [WARNING ] tfm-rubygem-passenger-devel not in
comps-foreman-rhel7.xml
2017-06-19 12:20:27 [WARNING ] No build for package mod_passenger in
package listing for tag foreman-nightly-rhel7-dist
Any advice on these would be appreciated.
···
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I deleted about 1800 packages which were obvious to me (subpackages,
> wrong packages tfm vs nonscl), added few missing. Here is full log:
>
> https://gist.github.com/lzap/9074e85da2875a542ef81f338df75c77
>
> I am still in doubt with few of others (mostly passenger and
> tfm/tfm-build packages). Do you see something incorrect on this list?
>
> https://gist.github.com/lzap/6a0fcc774bd14a15a30daf702827c5db
>
> If not, I will go ahead and execute the rest on Monday.
>
> Updated version of my script is at
>
> https://gist.github.com/lzap/cc6c100feb0a558f961eaa07e01bfa59
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I created a small script
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/lzap/cc6c100feb0a558f961eaa07e01bfa59
>>
>> which compares our whitelists agains koji. The first phase is packages
>> added to tags. It was used to generate this wiki page where I want to
>> track review process. The same script can be modified to generate koji
>> commands to remove/add packages. I am currently starting with review:
>>
>> If you spot a package name that should not be added or removed, please
>> uncheck it and make a comment in the gist or here:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/lzap/0e0ee1a7f11ccd9eaba45282391862a6
>>
>> Most of the packages are simply either subpackage which should not be
>> present (we add only source package names) or packages that should not
>> be both in nonscl-scl or core-plugin. And then there's the rest.
>>
>> For example I found mod_passenger to be removed but I believe this is
>> correctly tagged (we carry this dependency in our repos), so I
>> unchecked. I will carry on tomorrow with review.
>>
>> If you reviewed all the packages please let me know here or in the gist. Thanks
>>
>> This is the first stage, the next would be review of tags, I don't
>> know yet how to do that one. If anyone have an idea how to automate
>> that, let me know.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Later,
>> Lukas @lzap Zapletal
>
>
>
> --
> Later,
> Lukas @lzap Zapletal