Is there any chance of resurrecting staypuft?
Currently the hot direction in openstack is domain specific installers
like TripleO or Mirantis.
They are nice but they kind of assume your environment is nothing but
openstack.
I would like to use foreman to manage an infrastructure part of which
would be an openstack installation.
I am happy to help out where I can but my ruby skills are not quite up
to grabbing the git code and forking my own version.
To my knowledge, there are no plans of doing that.
Staypuft was primarily simplified version of Foreman, basically. All you
could do with it you can do with Foreman, and couple of standard plugins
(like Discovery).
Is there any other way of installing OpenStack(on physical
servers, Baremetal deployment) with foreman??
···
On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 9:11:32 AM UTC+1, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>
> > Is there any chance of resurrecting staypuft?
>
> To my knowledge, there are no plans of doing that.
>
> Staypuft was primarily simplified version of Foreman, basically. All you
> could do with it you can do with Foreman, and couple of standard plugins
> (like Discovery).
>
> --
> Later,
> Lukas #lzap Zapletal
>
I believe there was a spin of Staypuft that had in installer and would
install Foreman like the katello-installer.
But Staypuft proper is just a plugin to Foreman that manages the
orchestration of building an OpenStack environment.
Staypuft added a few functions and some specialized hostgroups to
Foreman that would make it easier to build an openstack environment.
OpenStack has at a minimum several hundred parameters and requires 3+
networks.
There are 3+ types of system functions that can be setup on various hosts.
This makes for a non trivial configuration using the base foremen tools.
Part of the argument for Foreman is that it can be extended by plugins.
For example you could likely get all the same functions of Katello
without having to add in the plugin but the management would be horrible.
So a plugin to manage the complexity of something like building
OpenStack would make real sense.
It does not have to be all singing and dancing but it needs to handle
the higher level configuration tasks.
···
On 03/21/2016 05:45 AM, Sai Srinivas wrote:
> Is there any other way of installing OpenStack(on physical
> servers, Baremetal deployment) with foreman??
>
> On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 9:11:32 AM UTC+1, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>
> > Is there any chance of resurrecting staypuft?
>
> To my knowledge, there are no plans of doing that.
>
> Staypuft was primarily simplified version of Foreman, basically.
> All you
> could do with it you can do with Foreman, and couple of standard
> plugins
> (like Discovery).
>
> --
> Later,
> Lukas #lzap Zapletal
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Foreman users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> .
> To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com
> .
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
···
----- Original Message -----
> I believe there was a spin of Staypuft that had in installer and would
> install Foreman like the katello-installer.
>
> But Staypuft proper is just a plugin to Foreman that manages the
> orchestration of building an OpenStack environment.
> Staypuft added a few functions and some specialized hostgroups to
> Foreman that would make it easier to build an openstack environment.
>
> OpenStack has at a minimum several hundred parameters and requires 3+
> networks.
> There are 3+ types of system functions that can be setup on various hosts.
> This makes for a non trivial configuration using the base foremen tools.
>
> Part of the argument for Foreman is that it can be extended by plugins.
> For example you could likely get all the same functions of Katello
> without having to add in the plugin but the management would be horrible.
> So a plugin to manage the complexity of something like building
> OpenStack would make real sense.
> It does not have to be all singing and dancing but it needs to handle
> the higher level configuration tasks.
>
>
> On 03/21/2016 05:45 AM, Sai Srinivas wrote:
> > Is there any other way of installing OpenStack(on physical
> > servers, Baremetal deployment) with foreman??
> >
> > On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 9:11:32 AM UTC+1, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any chance of resurrecting staypuft?
> >
> > To my knowledge, there are no plans of doing that.
> >
> > Staypuft was primarily simplified version of Foreman, basically.
> > All you
> > could do with it you can do with Foreman, and couple of standard
> > plugins
> > (like Discovery).
> >
> > --
> > Later,
> > Lukas #lzap Zapletal
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Foreman users" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> > an email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> Alvin Starr || voice: (905)513-7688
> Netvel Inc. || Cell: (416)806-0133
> alvin@netvel.net ||
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Foreman users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to foreman-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
