Usage of api gems

now that hammer is using dynamic bindings, do we need to continue to use/update foreman_api and katello_api? or can those be EOL'd?

thanks

··· -- Adam Price Software Engineer Red Hat Inc., Raleigh

adprice at redhat dot com


http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/komidore64

We can drop them from the cli's perspective. What other components do
use it? Installer?

··· On 03/20/2014 08:34 PM, Adam Price wrote: > now that hammer is using dynamic bindings, do we need to continue to use/update foreman_api and katello_api? or can those be EOL'd? > > thanks >

Yes,
https://github.com/theforeman/puppet-foreman/blob/master/lib/puppet/provider/foreman_smartproxy/rest.rb.

··· On 24/03/14 09:38, Tomas Strachota wrote: > On 03/20/2014 08:34 PM, Adam Price wrote: >> now that hammer is using dynamic bindings, do we need to continue to use/update foreman_api and katello_api? or can those be EOL'd? >> >> thanks >> > > We can drop them from the cli's perspective. What other components do > use it? Installer?


Dominic Cleal
Red Hat Engineering

> >> now that hammer is using dynamic bindings, do we need to continue to
> >> use/update foreman_api and katello_api? or can those be EOL'd?
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >
> > We can drop them from the cli's perspective. What other components do
> > use it? Installer?
>
> Yes,
> https://github.com/theforeman/puppet-foreman/blob/master/lib/puppet/provider/foreman_smartproxy/rest.rb.

alright cool, so we'll keep building foreman_api. if nobody speaks up about katello_api, i'm going to pull it from nightly builds tomorrow morning.

thanks all!

··· ----- Original Message ----- > On 24/03/14 09:38, Tomas Strachota wrote: > > On 03/20/2014 08:34 PM, Adam Price wrote:


Dominic Cleal
Red Hat Engineering


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

  • adam price

Just for the record, staypuft installer script (hopefully foreman provisioning
setup part of foreman-installer in future) use foreman_api. So +1 for keeping
it.

··· -- Marek

On Monday 24 of March 2014 11:53:47 Adam Price wrote:

----- Original Message -----

On 24/03/14 09:38, Tomas Strachota wrote:

On 03/20/2014 08:34 PM, Adam Price wrote:

now that hammer is using dynamic bindings, do we need to continue to
use/update foreman_api and katello_api? or can those be EOL’d?

thanks

We can drop them from the cli’s perspective. What other components do
use it? Installer?

Yes,
https://github.com/theforeman/puppet-foreman/blob/master/lib/puppet/provid
er/foreman_smartproxy/rest.rb.
alright cool, so we’ll keep building foreman_api. if nobody speaks up about
katello_api, i’m going to pull it from nightly builds tomorrow morning.

thanks all!


Dominic Cleal
Red Hat Engineering


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

I'm aware of many users using it, please keep it.

Ohad

··· On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Marek Hulan wrote:

Just for the record, staypuft installer script (hopefully foreman
provisioning
setup part of foreman-installer in future) use foreman_api. So +1 for
keeping
it.