Using puma for Capybara tests?

As the version bump to Capybara 3.x just went into development, I’d like to discuss about using puma for the Cabybara tests. The is the default for Capybara 3.x, but I did set it to webrick like it was for 2.x. The execution with puma is a bit faster and the only downside I do see is that puma needs to get added to the bundle.

diff --git a/bundler.d/test.rb b/bundler.d/test.rb
index 00ecba0c0..0a5a5b1aa 100644
--- a/bundler.d/test.rb
+++ b/bundler.d/test.rb
@@ -19,4 +19,5 @@ group :test do
   gem 'rfauxfactory', '~> 0.1'
   gem 'robottelo_reporter', '~> 0.1'
   gem 'webmock'
+  gem 'puma'
diff --git a/test/integration_test_helper.rb b/test/integration_test_helper.rb
index fa7a10e94..d716f826d 100644
--- a/test/integration_test_helper.rb
+++ b/test/integration_test_helper.rb
@@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ Minitest::Retry.on_consistent_failure do |klass, test_name|
   Rails.logger.error("DO NOT IGNORE - Consistent failure - #{klass} #{test_name}")
-Capybara.server = :webrick
 Capybara.register_driver :poltergeist do |app|
   opts = {
     # To enable debugging uncomment `:inspector => true` and
  • Bring puma in
  • Continue to use webrick

0 voters